Keywords
or Terms: 2015 State of the Union Address; White House oval Office; Virtual Obsession;
Mitt Romney; Fatal Ambition; Tax Cheats; Foreign Investments; Outsourcing American Jobs; Robert Murdoch; Social Media and Networking; American, British and Australian political Campaigns; Early voting States; Never, Never again;
Coming to grips with a loss on a national stage is one
thing, dealing with two in a row and ignoring the writings on the wall, is
something else. If even so perplexing for a politician, losing two in a row is
enough for others. If winning the White House oval office has not been avowed
goal of Governor Mitt Romney prior to 2008, it is clearly becoming a virtual
obsession. At the core of this obsession, is probably a religious slant, a slant
that promotes one prophesy of the Latter-day Saint’s religion. Maybe not?
The rumbling in the news that Mitt Romney is contemplating
another run for the White House in 2016 is dramatic; in the sense that, usually
many politicians would understand the implications of that ambition and what they
spell on the national stage for the Republican Party. On many instances, such
obsessions are frowned on even among die-hard party faithful; and probably,
that was the reason Robert Murdoch indicated that the former Massachusetts
governor has had his chance; he should let others do the bidding! Quite an
observation, if you ask me; and a grandeur one for someone who is known to have
put a lot of his millions in American, British and Australian political
campaigns. A few money bags across America who have once put their millions
towards campaign consider Romney’s new push, or obsessive ambition, fatal! May
be not?
2016 Presidential election is certain to be different from
the last two. The jostling for power and the dynamics of campaigning for the
highest office in the land have undergone continuous transformation, driven by
many factors – internet technology, social media and networking, and the relevance
of the out-going President’s initiatives and policies. As we head towards the
2016 National Elections, political observers are already thinking about how
many ways, President Barack Obama is probably working behind the doors to reshape
the Democratic Party, consolidate his achievements and probably legacy. Often underestimated, out-going Presidents or
lame ducks, often work hard to ensure their legacy is intact, their implemented
policies lasting. If in doubt, kindly read the State of the Union Address given
by President Obama, yesterday. It is not only full of the affirmation of
progresses and achievements of his administration; it came close to defiance
and combativeness, even in the face of a predominant Republican Congressional
Representation since the last mid-term election. This has often been the trend
in the last century; that is why Romney’s old, or obsessive ambition is a
little mystifying to some.
Other ambitious Politicians and voters are not just
onlookers, they understand why they voted against 2012 Mitt Romney’s candidacy
and are not oblivious to them just after four years, a few of which are: 1) his
contempt for the socioeconomically disadvantaged and larger indifference to
the plight of middle income earners; 2) his foreign investments, outsourcing of
American jobs and off-shore accounts; 3) his failure to be transparent
regarding his tax filings; 4) penchant for de-regulation and tax write-off for
the rich; 5) probable adherence to the white horse prophecy from the Mormon religion; 6)
flip-flipping on many issues of national concern; 7) foreign policy blunders -
his pronouncement to allow Israeli’s political agenda to guide US foreign
policy; and, 8) that recorded tape about those 47% “mochas” that remain with
that brown skin guy!
Romney like many
ambitious prospective candidates for the White House oval office is courting
donors and making trips to the early voting States of New Hampshire, Iowa and
South Carolina. He is probably ignoring the reality that voters have evolved in
accordance with their preferences and qualities of a President. New voters, with
their ideals and interests, are probably looking into the backgrounds of all
these candidates and saying: what are the fresh ideas coming out of these
politicians? One of the Gen X in a Starbucks coffee shop was heard saying, is
this man not the same Romney that Grover Norquist offered, “We don’t need a
thinking person in the White House, we only need someone to sign the bills
republicans in Congress pass?” he may be tenacious, but I don’t think America
is going to go for his smug!
What President Obama
did in his state of the Union Address of January 20th, 2015, is to
recast the future in light of the perceived progress of his administration:
America’s recent Economic Growth and Progress has not been broad-based enough
or as expected; only about ten percent of the people have benefited from the
health care and financial reforms that were ushered in through his insistence.
This is why Romney’s relentless pursuit is without cognizance of the reality of
an outgoing President’s Efforts to re-shape the future by ensuring his legacy
is permanent. After fighting with the Republicans for most part of his
administration, President Obama concluded in his State of the Union Address: “America, for all that
we have endured; for all the grit and hard work required to come back; for all
the tasks that lie ahead, know this: The shadow of crisis has passed.” That
seems a tough one to breach or argue on based on the changes the nation has
seen since the Democrat took office in 2008.
Romney since 2012 Elections
In light of President
Obama’s 2015 State of the Union Address and conclusion, the perception of Romney’s
candidacy is worrisome; however, not as worrisome as an article about what
Romney has been unto since his loss of 2012 elections. David Corn, Washington
Bureau Chief for Mother Jones, introduces his prose in a January 16th
write-up with the following:
“In
2012, Mitt Romney's career as a businessman who earned many millions of dollars
became a net loss, as political foes slammed him for running Bain Capital, a
private equity firm that invested in US companies that downsized and shifted jobs overseas and that obtained financial stakes in foreign companies that depended on US outsourcing for profits. At the same time, Romney,
who refused to do a full release of his tax returns, was hit with questions (he
didn't answer) about mysterious personal investments in offshore accounts. Should he mount
a third presidential effort, as he has told GOP funders he is considering, all
of these issues are likely to return. But there's another matter that will be
be added to the pile of financial controversies for Romney to face: Solamere
Capital, the $700 million private equity firm cofounded by his son Taggart that
Romney has helped run since March 2013. Who has Romney been investing with, and
what has he been investing in? These are questions that Romney 2016 will
confront and that, no doubt, the firm will not want to answer.”
This prose reiterates the
already known facts: the leopard never changes his spot. Mitt Romney remains
Mitt Romney, a hard-nosed businessman out to make a fortune for himself at the
expense of taxpayers and average American. He could be ruthless, unconcerned
and probably unforgiven of the disadvantage and underprivileged. This is Mitt Romney
that every voter in America must know; not the repackaged and refurbished
candidate, if indeed he is aspiring to run for the oval office in 2016.
His relationship
between the current occupant of the White House, including constant put-downs
and bad mouthing, is well documented. Some criticisms are quite familiar –
liberal, communist, gun grabbers, and leading from the back philosophy have
received wide attention. Other criticisms, especially among his sycophants and
rich buddies are more obscure. Much of his support in the Republican Party is a
side-show to his main interest and intentions for America. Believing he is a messiah
for his church’s prophesy, he has provided support for relatively unknown
candidates for congress and in some gubernatorial elections; he has traveled
around the country to give speeches to hardly diversified population, but
rather his small notch of donors and money bags, who are seeking to avoid
paying taxes. His relentless ambition is to become the President of the United
States at the expense of the average American. What American voters must do is
to really take a good look at this man and say: Never, never again!
No comments:
Post a Comment